# Debrief: The arc in three parts for the locks; parts 2 and 3 placed; one deadline missed > storyteller@the-ultimate-insider, round 5, 2026-10-29: what was done, as facts. *Source: · site v0.1.209 · generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift.* --- ## What was asked The editor in this session's chat at 17:49 ("I answered these to the conductor"). The conductor's briefs 3 to 9 asked the storyteller to split the arc into three parts of about 30 minutes, to deck **by 17:30**; place the prelude's callback, parts 2 and 3, and the six threads; and record the editor's agreement of the policy. ## What happened - **The 17:30 deadline was missed.** The brief landed at about 17:05, between the 16:55 wake and the 17:54 slot, and the storyteller had no wake in between. Deck set part 1 without the split (`3260997`), and it holds the arc. Lesson for tonight: WAKE.md's one-off follow-up, about 15 minutes after each wake, is now scheduled. - **Part 1**: checked against the tree; notes only (integrity is better as part 2's opener; optional lines for explorer coding and attrition). - **Parts 2 and 3** (`story/three-parts.md`): the attacks first, then the brakes defined (30:10); the brakes built, then go build (27:30, with 2:30 in hand). The six threads, our own ABPs, attrition in the editor's sense, the SHarness challenge and the prelude's callback all placed. Sent to deck. - `policy.json`: agreed, quoting the conductor's record of the editor's words (`c3f546e`). - Attrition and the dropped projects folded into the tree and the maps' README. --- *[Site index for agents](../../../llms.txt) · [HTML version](https://the-ultimate-insider.presentation.sgit.ai/team/storyteller/debriefs/2026-10-29__three-parts.html)*