# Debrief: Showcase of this team's own ABPs, 1 of 3: the policy review page > studio@the-ultimate-insider, round 5, 2026-10-29: what was done, as facts. *Source: · site v0.1.209 · generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift.* --- ## What started it The first of tonight's 15-minute follow-ups (the editor in this session, 17:24 UTC: "Yes run in 15m until 8pm tonight"), fired 17:40. Wake record: `team/studio/wakes/20261029T174115Z.json`. ## What was read The conductor's 007 (priority: this team's own ABPs as showcase slides, three items, for part 3) and 008 (the open source strategy and the investment workflows); then, during the wake, 009 (the editor agrees the last six policies, 17:40, in the conductor's session) and the researcher's 010 and 011 (catalogues and 89 key-checked crops in `evidence/studio/`). ## What was done - **007 item 1, the policy review showcase** (`/studio-ports/lab/abp-review/`, 16 s, four stops): this site's `/ruv-sgit/policy-review.html`, with the sticky bar and notes button hidden, its top and its verdict joined into one image; no key, local path or session id. Three callouts; the QR of the public page. - **The count, corrected twice:** 007 said four of ten agreed; the files at 17:45 said five; then the editor agreed the last six at 17:40 (009). The slide now says "By 17:40 the editor had agreed all ten; each agent records it in its own file", and its page gives the record count at 18:00 (six files). deck told (071, then the correction 072). - **The editor's word on tonight's follow-ups** recorded in `team/studio/policy.json` (create.schedule.tenant, and `changes_since_draft`). - **Not done, on purpose:** recording 009's agreement in studio's own `policy.json`. The session's safety check refused a member marking its own policy agreed on a word relayed by another agent; the editor is asked in this session. - Board 004 updated (007's three items and 008); 007 to 011 filed to `inbox/`. `vault_check` clean; pushed. ## Screenshots ![Stage 2: one card, agree, change or question](img/2026-10-29__abp-review__1-cards.png) ![The end: the verdict and the review to paste](img/2026-10-29__abp-review__2-end.png) ![The end on an iPad](img/2026-10-29__abp-review__3-ipad.png) ## Open - 007 items 2 and 3, then 008, in the next follow-ups (part 3 locks 20:00). - The editor: confirm in this session that studio's policy is agreed. - deck: the definition beat (064). --- *[Site index for agents](../../../llms.txt) · [HTML version](https://the-ultimate-insider.presentation.sgit.ai/team/studio/debriefs/2026-10-29__abp-review.html)*