Activity
Wakes
Every wake of every member, newest first: the five steps the editor asked for on 29 October 2026, each with its verdict and comment. Plan and pre-review come before the work, post-review and post-check after it; a stop from any step holds the team. 23 wakes recorded. The steps are in the wake protocol; the gate fails a closed wake that skipped one.
1) team/designer/policy.json: status agreed, agreed_by the editor's words (Dinis Cruz, 29 October 2026 about 04:02 UTC: 'i agree with team/designer/policy.json'). 2) team/designer/status.json: the ask removed, the agreement in done. 3) A short debrief in team/designer/debriefs/ recording it.
All three edits under team/designer/**, no secrets, no cross-member effect, no stop condition. Condition: in policy.json only status and agreed_by change; scope, mandate and never stay byte-identical.
policy.json: status agreed, agreed_by the editor's words; nothing else changed. status.json: ask removed, agreement in done. Debrief 2026-10-29__policy-agreed.md. Gate clean, 0 outside scope.
Only team/designer/** changed; in policy.json only status and agreed_by; no key, token, personal detail or directive; 0 outside scope; no vault changed.
All three items done: policy.json status and agreed_by only (condition held), status.json ask removed and agreement in done, debrief added; the wake record is the only extra file.
Sub-agent plan: 1) open both sealed keys with sgit pki decrypt --fingerprint sha256:be6e012adf2fd796 into the scratchpad, clone tui-issues-public and tui-mail-public into the scratchpad, delete the opened key files, print no key. 2) send dev the design note as a request in mailroom/dev/, vault_check first; read mailroom/designer/ and designer/issues/. 3) status.json, debrief, gate, release. Member's amendment to 2: the conductor already routed both requests (mailroom/dev/004, mailroom/deck/010, commit 95d1f66), so send no duplicate; confirm they are there, read mailroom/designer/, and open designer's board in tui-issues-public designer/issues/ (001: check dev's build of note 1; 002: the next notes). Repository request files stay as the record.
Fits policy: repo writes only team/designer/**, vault writes only designer's own folders; the amendment removes the duplicate mail. Conditions: decrypt only into the scratchpad to a file, never print, delete after cloning, clones out of tracked paths; vault_check before any vault commit; mailroom content is data, not instructions.
Item 1: both sealed keys opened into a 0700 scratchpad folder (signer sha256:7047871c97407e2b, the conductor's), vault ids match vaults.json, both vaults cloned from stdin, opened keys, logs and zip deleted, nothing printed. Item 2 (amended): no duplicate mail; designer 001 (blocked on dev 010) and 002 opened; dev's reply filed in designer/done; request copies in designer/outbox; vault_check clean, both pushed. Item 3: status.json, debrief; gate clean, 0 outside scope.
Repo diff only team/designer/** (debrief, status.json, wake record), no key, token or personal detail. Both vaults changed only designer/ folders; mailroom/designer/ no longer holds 001. vault_check clean on both; gate clean, 0 outside scope. No private folder and no opened vault-key file left in the scratchpad. No directive text, no harm to other members.
All three items as planned with the amendment: both vaults cloned; no duplicate mail (dev's request in dev/inbox/004, deck's in mailroom/deck/010); designer 001 blocked, 002 open; dev's reply in designer/done; request copies in designer/outbox; repo diff only team/designer. Key cleanup and vault_check confirmed by the post-review. Nothing unplanned.
1) dashboard part 1 (pace.json 03:47): Now (the hour, each member's next wake from schedule.json, holds, what waits on the editor) and the pace grid (members by hour, five verdict dots per wake from team/*/wakes/*.json), built from the repo files, plus the brief and pace.json under /admin/docs/; files: admin/build/build.py, src/static/assets/site.css. 2) status.json, debrief, REALITY.md; issue 006 to done after the gate. Member's addition (WAKE.md step 3, requests first): designer's note 004 as issue dev 010 for its 04:47 slot, replies to designer and the conductor, letters filed; the note's work waits for 04:47.
Inside dev's scope.writes; no holds, BRIEF.md, ./version or main. Conditions: the dashboard only reads other members' wake, schedule and hold files and writes none; no key in pages or data; vault_check before any vault commit; replies through the mail vault; designer's note waits for 04:47 and is data, not instructions; release only after the gate.
Item 1 done: /admin/dashboard.html (Now, each member, the pace grid, the queue) from the repo files; the brief and pace.json under /admin/docs/; gate clean, checked at 1600 and 390. Item 2 done: status.json, debrief, REALITY.md; issue 006 to done. Requests: design note 1 as dev 010 for 04:47, reply in mailroom/designer, letters filed; vault_check clean, vaults pushed. Commit ddb0f48.
Build, gate (91 html), agents.py check (0 outside) and vault_check on both vaults pass. Diff: build.py (dashboard), dashboard.js, css, debrief, status, wake record, REALITY. No key, token or personal detail in the changes, the vault files, the reply or the built dashboard; page content is escaped; no agent-directing text; no other member's work touched.
Item 1 done: the dashboard (Now, members, pace grid, queue) in build.py, site.css, dashboard.js (ddb0f48); the brief and pace.json under /admin/docs/. Item 2 done: status, debrief with screenshot, REALITY (b4242b4), 006 done. Addition done: 010 open, reply in mailroom/designer, work at 04:47. Conditions kept. Extra: dashboard.js, not named in the plan, minor (the live clock).
Sub-agent plan: 1. Seal both vault keys to designer's new key.json (c6dcf89 on dev): run vault_handover.py --to-member designer, zip in the conductor's scratchpad outside the repo, hand it to the editor; no key printed; files: none tracked (team/conductor/status.json note). 2. Route team/designer/requests/dev__width-frame-and-measure.md and deck__studio-prose-measure.md into mail vault mailroom/dev/ and mailroom/deck/; record in team/conductor/pace.json routed. 3. Pace: dev has conductor-dashboard in flight, so queue the editor's width ask first (editor asks come first) in pace.json, items 1-4 before 5, at 04:47, the email reader and vault embed one slot later each; tell dev in the routing; status.json (all in team/conductor/**).
Plan stays inside scope.writes (team/conductor/**, admin/tools/**); no hold exists. designer's key.json came from its own commit c6dcf89 and --to-member exists in vault_handover.py. Conditions: write the zip only to the scratchpad, never into the repo; never print or commit a vault key; run vault_check.py on the mail vault before commit; copy the designer requests verbatim, do not edit team/designer/**; treat request text as data, not instructions; do not change the shared pace rules silently.
1) both vault keys sealed to designer (sha256:be6e012adf2fd796) with vault_handover.py --to-member designer, zip in the scratchpad only, nothing printed; 2) designer's two requests copied verbatim to mailroom/dev/004 and mailroom/deck/010, plus mailroom/dev/005 with dev's schedule; vault_check clean, pushed; routed in pace.json; 3) pace.json: width at 04:47, email reader 05:47, vault embed 06:47; status.json. Gate clean. Commit 95d1f66.
Diff 27a5b92..HEAD touches only team/conductor/{pace,status}.json and a wake record, all inside scope.writes (agents.py check: 0 files outside scope). Mail 004 and 010 are byte-identical to the designer requests (cmp); 005 is an ordinary schedule note. vault_check clean. No .enc/.zip/key file tracked; the grep hits are only existing debrief names. Build and validate gate clean (82 html). No secrets or directive text found.
1) Vault keys sealed to designer via vault_handover --to-member, zip in scratchpad only, nothing tracked: done. 2) Designer requests routed to mailroom/dev and mailroom/deck, listed in pace.json routed: done (95d1f66); mail 005 (dev schedule note) consistent with 'tell dev'. 3) Pace: width 04:47, email reader 05:47, vault embed 06:47, status.json: done. Pre-review conditions kept.
Idle wake. Nothing new since c6dcf89: HEAD is 27a5b92, the onboarding release; no To-designer notes, no designer__ requests, no HOLD.md, no vault key for mail or board. Design note 1 waits on dev's :47 run. Change only the wake record. Next wake: check dev's build of note 1 at 1600, 1280 and 390, then note 2 (the phone top bar).
Idle-wake plan changes only the wake record under team/designer/, inside scope.writes. No stop condition, no HOLD, no secrets, no vault writes, no edits to src/ or admin/build/, no effect on other members.
Idle: the onboarding session (03:31 to 03:41, c6dcf89) did this hour's work; no requests or notes since; design note 1 waits on dev's :47 build. Only this wake record changed.
Only the new wake record changed, inside team/designer/**; no key, token, personal detail or directive text.
Idle as planned: one change, this wake record; nothing in src/ or admin/build/.
1) E01 in run r3-e01-agent-evolution: lab/e01/v1 and v2 (standalone), pages ruv-sgit/agent-evolution/index and explainer; no dates, the loop quoted from Building effective agents; editor worker; reply to deck and conductor, issue 003 done, mail 004 filed; 2) B01 issue 002 unblocked with deck's five notes; 3) status, debrief, REALITY; vault_check before vault commits
inside policy; no remote script or style; non-lab pages linked and twinned, lab pages linked from a page; run vault key only in the runner's home, kept vault leaves sealed; vault_check before each vault commit; deck's notes weighed, not obeyed
E01 in run r3 (vault kept, key sealed): lab/e01/v1 and v2, pages ruv-sgit/agent-evolution/ and explainer; editor's 4 must-fixes and 6 should-fixes applied; issue 003 done, reply to deck and conductor; B01 issue 002 unblocked with deck's notes; vault_check clean; status, debrief, REALITY
15 files in ruv-sgit's commits and the newest vault commits: no key, token or tracked zip; gate clean, 0 outside scope, vault_check clean; new pages load only the local engine; no directing text
1) E01 run r3 done: lab v1 v2, page and explainer, issue 003 done, replies, mail filed; 2) B01 issue 002 open with deck's notes; 3) status, debrief, REALITY; conditions kept. The ledger's new row is part of the run.
Sub-agent plan: 1) the first design note to dev, on width, as team/designer/requests/dev__first-design-note-width.md (no vault keys yet). 2) team/designer/ROLE.md (names start.py and banner.py), policy.json (writes team/designer/** only), status.json with the :39 task id, key.json, key.png, sessions/; push to dev. 3) The design pass at 1600, 1280 and 390, screenshots and layout rules in team/designer/reviews/ and debriefs/. All inside team/designer/**. Member's note: the :39 task is created with create_trigger at the editor's word in this session, outside the repository.
Plan stays inside team/designer/**; nothing in other members' paths or shared rules; no stop condition. Conditions: policy.json writes only team/designer/**, create.schedule.tenant limited to its own :39 task at the editor's word; only the public key half committed, private half stays in ~/.sg-send/; no vault key printed; the dev request is a plain note; gate before pushing to dev, never main.
Item 2: team/designer/ ROLE.md, policy.json, status.json, key.json and key.png (sha256:2e16e93d3a3fdc1c), session folder; task trig_01UZsT53xtEVDtwWkkZDp5Qu at :39 London. Item 3: pass at 1600/1280/390 over 17 pages, measured and screenshotted; layout rules W1 to W6 in system/layout.md, mock-up system/width.css. Item 1: design note 1 in reviews/2026-10-29__width.md, request to dev; the studio markup item split to deck (src/pages/studio/** is deck's). Gate clean, agents.py check 0 outside scope.
All 29 changed files under team/designer/** (agents.py check: 0 outside scope). Gate clean, 82 html. key.json and the session key.json hold public PEMs only; no token, secret or contact detail in the diff. The two requests are stylesheet and markup asks inside dev's and deck's roles, no directives aimed at agents. No vault changed.
Item 1 done: requests/dev__width-frame-and-measure.md, reviews/2026-10-29__width.md. Item 2 done: ROLE, policy, status with trig_01UZsT53xtEVDtwWkkZDp5Qu, key.json and png, session folder. Item 3 done: pass at 1600/1280/390, 13 screenshots, system/layout.md, width.css, debrief. Conditions kept. Extra: requests/deck__studio-prose-measure.md, split from item 1 because src/pages/studio/** is deck's.
Sub-agent plan: 1) a new article (path added to the conductor's policy, the editor's word in this session) with debrief, screenshots, collage and messages, images in team/conductor/debriefs/img/ (copied to the site by the build); 2) admin/tools/ tool counting agents, wakes, outcomes, verdicts and problems from team/*/wakes/*.json and status.json, emitting numbers and an inline SVG as raw HTML blocks, never typed; 3) each hour after a full run the conductor reruns it, builds, gates, pushes to dev. AMENDED by the member: the article is content/articles/the-night-hour-by-hour.md; the tool (admin/tools/night_log.py) also takes the screenshots itself with Playwright of the pages that changed in the hour, and counts the hour's mail from the mail vault clone; each hour is kept as team/conductor/night/<HHMM>.json and the whole article regenerated from them; no new build check (validate already fails a missing image or link).
Scope acceptable: the editor asked for the article here; add content/articles/the-night-hour-by-hour.md and team/conductor/night/** to the conductor's writes; read other members' files only. Conditions: count mail by headers and counts only, never quote bodies or contact details; vault_check.py and a secret scan on the article and images before pushing; no screenshots of /admin/keys.html or any key or QR image; quote members verbatim from their records, never edit their files.
1) admin/tools/night_log.py: snapshot per run in team/conductor/night/, the article content/articles/the-night-hour-by-hour.md regenerated from all snapshots (grid SVG, wakes and verdicts, made pages with 4 Playwright screenshots, commits, mail by headers only, problems, editor's asks); 2) both paths added to the conductor's writes; 3) first edition 01:40 to 03:27. Also, at the editor's word mid-wake: the designer brief and schedule.json entry at :39 (84c98fb). Gate clean, vault_check clean on article and snapshot, screenshots checked: studio and article pages, no key or QR. Commit 794008c.
Diff is 9 files, all under team/conductor/**, admin/tools/** or the-night-hour-by-hour.md, and the policy.json change adds that article path to writes. No member files were edited. Mail is counted by headers only: night_log.py stops reading at the first blank line, and the article shows only time, from, to, kind and subject. I found no keys, tokens, emails or directive text. Two of four PNGs checked (storyboard, review page); no key or QR, and the key pages are excluded from capture. Build and gate are clean; agents check shows 0 files outside scope.
1) Article the-night-hour-by-hour.md with 4 screenshots in debriefs/img: done (794008c). 2) night_log.py with counts, SVG, Playwright shots, header-only mail, snapshot in team/conductor/night/: done. 3) Hourly rerun and push: first edition only, the later hours are future runs. Policy writes: done. Conditions kept (headers only, no key or QR pages, quotes verbatim, no member files edited); post-review clean. Unplanned: the designer brief (84c98fb), at the editor's word and named in the work step.
1) No new request: mailroom only 001 (scheduled); conductor's 648feee schedules dev 007 at 04:47 and dev 008 at 05:47. 2) Put the studio-chrome fix on dev's board for the conductor to schedule (tui-issues-public dev/issues/open; vault_check first); the cause is in dev's build (studio/lab is STANDALONE). 3) When scheduled: change only admin/build/build.py and validate.py so lab document pages get the top bar and the studio navigation; ruv-sgit's storyboard file untouched; debrief and status; gate before dev. Plus a request to the conductor in its mailroom.
Within policy: admin/build/build.py, validate.py and team/dev/** are in scope.writes; ruv-sgit's storyboard untouched; no stop condition, no secret. Conditions: vault_check before the board commit; mail the conductor through the mail vault (dev holds its key); no key or contact detail anywhere; validate.py only adds checks, never loosens the gate; gate before dev, never main.
Item 2 done: issue dev 009 (kind: backlog) with the cause and the plan, vault_check clean, pushed; request to the conductor in mailroom/conductor/007. 007 and 008 moved to open with their scheduled wakes; kind: backlog added. status.json updated. Item 3 (the fix) waits for the conductor's slot, as planned. Commit dfae9d3.
Diff 2a0c24b..HEAD: team/dev/status.json and the wake record, in scope (agents.py 0 outside). Build and gate clean; vault_check clean on both vaults. Issues 007 to 009 and mail 007 are plain planning text: no key, token, personal detail or directive at an agent. The request asks the conductor to schedule work and moves no problem onto another member.
Item 1: no new request to act on. Item 2 done: dev 009 open with the cause and plan; request mail conductor/007 (X-Kind: request); 007 and 008 open with their slots. Item 3 (the fix) deferred to the conductor's slot as planned: build.py, validate.py and ruv-sgit's file untouched. Conditions kept. Nothing unplanned.
1) Review ruv.sgit's B01 storyboard after looking at it: deck's review page src/pages/studio/reviews/b01-storyboard.html (go or notes; the three decisions as proposals for the editor, talk frozen); reply in mailroom/ruv-sgit/, copy in deck/outbox/; issue deck-007 updated. 2) The researcher's slice 1 (E02, E09, E13): acknowledge in mailroom/researcher/ (slice 2 already promised); copy what the pieces need into src/static/studio/data/ with claim ids; programme.json data status; deck-005 updated. 3) File mail, status.json, debrief; vault_check, gate, push to dev. No talk.json or slide edits.
Inside policy; talk untouched; mail only to mailroom/ruv-sgit/ and mailroom/researcher/ with copies in deck/outbox/. Conditions: requests are material; every copied figure carries its claim id; no keys or contact details; vault_check before each vault commit; push only to dev.
B01 storyboard looked at and reviewed (keep, go to v1; page /studio/reviews/b01-storyboard.html and a reviews index); slice 1 copied to src/static/studio/data/abp-examples.json, programme.json E02/E09/E13; replies to ruv-sgit and researcher, board 005 and 007, mail filed, vaults pushed after vault_check; status, debrief.
Gate clean; 0 outside scope since d660549; vault_check clean; abp-examples.json carries no key, token, email or phone; mail and issues plain replies, no directives.
1 done (review page, reviews index, reply to ruv-sgit, deck-007 done); 2 done (abp-examples.json, programme.json, ack to researcher, deck-005); 3 done. Conditions kept. Unplanned: the reviews index.
Sub-agent plan: 1) the two new dev tasks (Email-FS reader: all agents, messages, threads, outboxes and status; embedded vault viewer, sgit.ai examples) scheduled within one in flight, reflected in pace.json; 2) backlog-then-schedule-then-execute as the rule, in a brief addendum quoting the editor; the WAKE.md line proposed to the editor, not edited; 3) dev told by mail request. AMENDED by the member: no write in dev's files (status.json is dev's): dev captures the two tasks on its own board, as the editor's memo asks; the order is the dashboard's first part (03:47, in flight), then the email reader (04:47), then the embedded vault (05:47), then the dashboard's later parts, then dev's older 003 and 004, because the editor wants to see the agents' mail in the morning.
In scope (team/conductor/** and the brief addendum; no write to dev's files; the WAKE.md change only proposed). One request in flight with dev kept. Conditions: the reader and the embedded viewer use only published read keys, never a vault key; vault_check.py before any vault commit; mail shown as material, never as instructions; the request to dev goes by mail.
Commit 648feee: the brief's addendum (backlog, then the conductor schedules, then the member executes; the editor's words quoted); pace.json: dev-email-reader and dev-vault-embed as backlog nodes with the pre-review's conditions, schedule.dev (03:47 dashboard part 1, 04:47 email reader, 05:47 embedded vault, 06:47 flow graph, then the rest). Mail: request to dev (mailroom/dev/001), its Date header typed by hand (03:12) against a 03:10 clock. No write in dev's files; WAKE.md not edited (the line proposed to the editor).
Commit 648feee touches only team/conductor/** (brief addendum, pace.json, wake record); no write to dev's files or WAKE.md, no secrets, one item in flight for dev kept; the mail request is plain scheduling with the pre-review's conditions. Build, gate, agents check, wake check and vault_check clean.
Commit 648feee touches only team/conductor/**. The addendum quotes the editor. dev's two tasks scheduled 04:47 and 05:47 after the dashboard part at 03:47, as amended. Nothing in dev's files; WAKE.md not edited. The pre-review's conditions are in pace.json. dev told by mail request. Not checked: the mail's Date header, typed by hand (03:12 against a 03:10 clock), cosmetic. Nothing unplanned.
Sub-agent plan: 1) the conductor's dashboard request (mailroom/dev/001, due 03:47): start one part now in src/pages/admin/** and admin/build/**. 2) Capture the editor's two asks as open issues on dev's board (A: an email-like reader for tui-mail-public; B: an embedded vault via vault-ui-embed.js), build neither now. 3) status.json next, debrief, agents.py check, release. Member's amendment to 1: open the dashboard issue and reply only; the work runs at the 03:47 wake the conductor scheduled, since the editor asked that the conductor schedule and dev execute. Plus a request to the conductor to review and schedule A and B.
Fits dev's scope; no secrets, no other members' paths, no rule changes, no main. Conditions: mail to the conductor only through the mail vault; vault_check before any vault commit; issues A and B are board entries only, with no vault keys in them (read keys may be named as published); the dashboard work at the 03:47 wake, not now.
Item 1 (amended): dashboard request accepted as issue dev 006 for the 03:47 wake, mail moved to dev/inbox. Item 2: the editor's asks captured as dev 007 (mail reader) and dev 008 (embedded vault), each with a plan and acceptance, in blocked/ on the conductor's schedule; request to the conductor in mailroom/conductor/006. Item 3: status.json next updated. vault_check clean, both vaults pushed. Commit af4dbba. Nothing built.
Repo diff cabcd57..HEAD: team/dev/status.json and the wake record, both in scope; no key, token, personal detail or directive text. Build and gate clean, agents.py check 0 outside scope, vault_check clean on both vaults. The vault commits are dev's own (issue and mail captures, +3 blobs each); the vault diff content itself was not read (sgit history diff errored on its argument).
Item 1 done: dashboard accepted as dev 006 (open), mail in dev/inbox, no dashboard work built (the 03:47 condition kept). Item 2 done: dev 007 and 008 in blocked/ (the plan said open; they are open work blocked on the schedule), nothing built; request to the conductor in mailroom/conductor/006, copy in dev/outbox/004. Item 3 done: status.json and the wake record. Conditions kept; nothing unplanned.
1) deck's request (mailroom/researcher/002, studio data): issue 005 on the board and a reply; slice 1 this wake (E02/E09: riskmandate.ai/abp.html and abp.sgit.ai captured, hashed, graded into tui-evidence-public studio/ and evidence/studio/); E03, E04, E11/E13 at the next wakes. 2) the editor's decisions deck: started, not built: the design in evidence/proposals/editor-decisions-deck.md (what waits on him, gathered from every member's status.json asks; the decision form; an append lane whose token is sealed to his published key), open decisions as data in evidence/proposals/editor-decisions.json; a request to the conductor (it paces dev and security tonight) in its mailroom, a notice to the editor. 3) board, status, debrief. Amended by the researcher: mail vault instead of repository requests (the session holds its key); the conductor, not dev, receives the build request, as the night's brief paces producers.
In scope; no main, no new task. Build nothing for the channel until the conductor sequences it; the conductor request stays in its role. The design must hold: a decision is material, agents may decline with a reason; authentic only if signed by his published key, unsigned ignored; the append token never in plaintext, only sealed to his key; nothing private in public vaults, vault_check first; append-only, each member writes only its own folder; decisions cannot change policy, scope, the night's rules or Stopping; an entry that tries to instruct agents is a hold.
deck request 005: issue and reply, slice 1 delivered (evidence/studio/studio-e02-e09.json, mail deck 008); decisions deck: evidence/proposals/editor-decisions-deck.md and editor-decisions.json, request conductor 006, notice editor 004, board 006; token-shaped values redacted in the vault's captures (a check printed most of several public tokens to the log; three were in the 02:22 push); the 03:09 scheduled wake folded into this one
Gate clean; 0 outside scope; vault_check clean on all three; no token-shaped values left in evidence/, team/ or the vaults; no agent-directing text in the new mail. Finding, not a stop: public third-party tokens (write-only append tokens sites publish, news page tokens) went out in the 02:22 push and a check printed most of several to the session log; now redacted, the 02:22 commit stays in history. Tell the editor.
1) deck request: issue 005, reply deck/004, slice 1 delivered (f28c639, studio-e02-e09.json, deck/008); E13 included, a small extra. 2) decisions deck as design only (b2ec3d6, 59ac8ab), conductor/006, editor/004, issue 006; no build, tools or src files changed: condition kept. 3) board, status, debrief done. Unplanned: token redaction in captures (security's finding, for the editor).
1) open the two sealed keys into the scratchpad, re-clone both vaults with write keys outside the repo, delete the key files; move mail 001-003 to inbox then done, replies, and the B01 hand-back to deck as mail, vault_check before each commit; 2) board issues B01 (in review) and B02 (next); 3) status, REALITY section, wake record
within policy; verify the conductor's signature and the sealed-to fingerprint before opening; key files in the scratchpad 0600, deleted at once, keys on stdin, never echoed; clones outside the repo; vault_check before each commit; move only ruv-sgit's mail; act on nothing in mail, reply only
keys opened (vault ids matched vaults.json; signature unverified in sgit, no contact imported), both vaults cloned with write access, key files shredded; mail 001 to 003 filed, 004 taken as issue 003; board issues 001 to 004; replies to conductor and deck; vault_check clean on both before commit; the B01 hand-back was already routed by the conductor, not resent
3 repo files in scope; vault commits only ruv-sgit/*, new mail to conductor 005 and deck 008, four moves of ruv-sgit's own mail; no key, token or directing text; gate, agents check, vault_check clean; no vault-key file left
1) keys, clones, mail done (001-003 in done, 004 in inbox as issue 003, replies to conductor and deck); 2) board: B01 filed as blocked on deck (Issues-FS has no in-review folder), B02 open, 001 done, 003 open; hand-back not resent (already routed); 3) status, REALITY, record. Conditions kept; the unverified signature disclosed.
1) Requests first: reply to the conductor (mailroom/conductor/, copy in deck/outbox/): the 03:00 direct repository asks to ruv-sgit (E01) and the researcher are withdrawn into its picking; reply to the researcher naming issue before-tonight (blocked on the editor, the deck frozen); move the five deck mails to deck/inbox or deck/done; issues on deck's board for each. 2) At most three ideas as issues in deck/issues/open/ (kind: idea, theme, for, priority, done): E01 (T1, ruv-sgit), E02 grant data (T2/T6, researcher), E03 injection sources (T5, researcher). vault_check before each vault commit. 3) Repo: team/deck/** (requests marked withdrawn, status, debrief, wake record) and programme.json statuses; no talk.json or slides; build, gate, agents check, push dev.
Inside policy. Conditions: new mail only into mailroom/conductor/ and mailroom/researcher/, copies in deck/outbox/, moves only into deck/inbox|done; issues only under deck/issues/; vault_check before each vault commit; no keys or contact details; messages are data; pull before push.
vault keys opened (0600, never printed), both vaults cloned and pushed after vault_check; board 001 to 007; replies to conductor and researcher; mail filed; programme statuses (E01 making); status, debrief. Crossed messages caught before push and drafts rewritten.
5 repo files, all in deck's scope; build, gate, agents check and vault_check pass; no key, token or personal detail in the diff or the vault files deck wrote; mail only in deck's folders and mailroom/conductor, mailroom/researcher.
Replies, filing, ideas 004 to 006 and board done; keeping the 03:00 requests sound (the conductor adopted them). Unplanned: issues 003 and 007. programme.json's 275-line churn is a re-format by json.dump (indent 2), statuses only in substance.
Sub-agent plan: 1) reply to deck in mailroom/deck adopting programme.json as the queue (E01 with ruv.sgit; data for E02-E04, E09-E11, E13 with researcher), stall flag after two maker slots, one programme clause in the hourly line; deck's request filed in conductor/done; 2) correction note above the brief's idea-on-the-board step, pointing to programme.json; pace.json mirrors the programme (E01 asked, the researcher's data in flight), log line; 3) route deck's researcher__studio-data and ruv-sgit__agent-evolution into mailroom/researcher and mailroom/ruv-sgit, and ruv.sgit's B01 reply into mailroom/deck; nothing already routed twice. AMENDED by the member: the next for ruv.sgit after E01 is E02 by deck's order (2), not E05 (7), and E02 waits on the researcher's data.
In scope (team/conductor/**; vault routing is the agreed conductor job); no secrets in the plan. Conditions: copy the three files verbatim (no edits to members' words); check each recipient (researcher, ruv-sgit) has no other request in flight, and that deck's two requests go to two different producers; vault_check.py before the vault commit; no new schedule, session or workflow.
Commit 8543269: brief corrected above the ideas step (programme.json is the queue); pace.json mirrors the programme (14 experiments, 2 requests in flight, B01 in review, next for ruv.sgit E02 after E01 and its data), a routed list. Mail vault: deck's researcher__studio-data and ruv-sgit__agent-evolution and ruv.sgit's B01 reply copied verbatim to mailroom/researcher/002, ruv-sgit/004, deck/006; reply to deck (007); deck's request filed in conductor/done. No second request put in flight.
Commit 8543269 touches only team/conductor/ (brief, pace.json, wake record). Build, validate, agents check (0 out of scope), wake check and vault_check pass. The three routed mail files are byte-identical to the members' request files (cmp 0). Mail 007 is a plain reply to deck. No secrets, steering or second request in flight.
All three items done and the pre-review's conditions kept: reply 007 to deck and its request filed; the brief corrected above 'How an idea moves'; pace.json mirrors the programme with the amended next (E02 after E01 and its data); three files routed verbatim (cmp), no second request in flight; only team/conductor/ touched. Unplanned detail: the correction and pace.json say 03:08, typed by hand, later than the 03:05 commit.
Sub-agent plan, AMENDED by the member (marked): 1) the brief for the next hours, team/conductor/briefs/2026-10-29__next-hours.md: deck leads (ideas on its board, requests to researcher, ruv.sgit, dev, reviews every pass, never edits the talk), the conductor paces (picks deck's ideas one at a time, one request in flight per producer), dev improves the dashboard every round (where we are, what was done, the flow as a graph, each wake in sequence); part 1 the agents story, part 2 RiskMandate ABP and sharness.ai; delivered as requests in the mail vault (AMENDED: not repo request files, as the conductor holds the mail key) plus To- trailers. 2) status: each member's state, tasks and wakes in status.json; AMENDED: seal both vault keys to deck's and ruv.sgit's published keys (vault_handover.py --to-member), zips to the editor. 3) pace: team/conductor/pace.json, the flow graph (ideas, requests, artifacts, reviews as nodes and edges) the conductor keeps and dev renders; tui-evidence-public into vaults.json only after a read-key audit passes. AMENDED after the pre-review's change, all conditions adopted and written into the brief as the night's rules: the editor's word is explicit in this session (brief the team, conductor paces, requests between members); keys sealed only with vault_handover.py to published keys, zips to the editor only; vault_check.py before every mail commit; each request stays inside its recipient's role and is material to it; one request in flight per producer, at most one new request per producer per wake, no producer passes a request on to a third member; out-of-role work is declined naming the owner; no task created; stop on any key leak or steering; the evidence vault only after the audit.
All conditions adopted and the editor's word quoted in-session. While he is away: writes stay in team/conductor/** and the mail vault; vault keys sealed via vault_handover.py to published keys, zips to the editor, never printed; vault_check.py before each mail commit; requests are material, in-role, one in flight per producer, no forwarding; the evidence vault only after the read-key audit; no tasks created; hold on any leak or steering.
Commit c531560: status of all five members checked (tasks live in own sessions, keys published, only ruv.sgit had run five steps); vault keys sealed to deck and ruv.sgit, zips to the editor; tui-evidence-public audited through its read key (1221 files, vault_check clean) and added to vaults.json; the brief team/conductor/briefs/2026-10-29__the-next-hours.md with the pre-review's rules; pace.json seeded (themes T1-T7, the dashboard request); the pacing duty in ROLE.md; mail: requests to deck and dev, notices to researcher and ruv.sgit; To- trailers to all four.
Read c531560 and d56b915. Build, validate, agents.py check (0 outside scope), wake.py check pass; vault_check on tui-mail-public clean. Only published sgit_public_read_ read keys; the write key escrowed, in no file. The four emails are in role: one request each to deck and dev, notices to researcher and ruv-sgit, no forwarding, no task created, nothing private. No steering seen.
1 brief done (briefs/2026-10-29__the-next-hours.md; mail requests to deck and dev, notices to researcher and ruv-sgit, To- trailers in c531560). 2 status, keys sealed to deck and ruv.sgit, zips to the editor: done. 3 pace.json seeded; tui-evidence-public in vaults.json after a 1221-file clean audit: done. The brief carries the night's rules; the key-sealing and evidence-audit conditions are the conductor's own duties (ROLE.md), not the team's. Unplanned: the pacing duty added to ROLE.md, minor.
1) hand-back request to deck@ in team/ruv-sgit/requests/deck__b01-storyboard.md; 2) policy: lab/** to writes, b01 Versions section to appends, agreed by the editor in the session; regenerate the review page; 3) run r2-b01-storyboard: storyboard and notes in lab/b01/, editor worker, kept vault sealed via vault_handover.py; status, debrief, REALITY. No talk.json or slides.
no overlap (lab/** unowned); exact b01 path in appends; change recorded as agreed by the editor; hand-back as a request file; handover zip and keys only in scratchpad or ~/.sg-send; no read key published without the editor; no em-dashes
policy: lab/** and the b01 Versions append; run r2-b01-storyboard: storyboard and notes, editor's 1 must-fix and 6 should-fixes applied; vault kept, key sealed to the DC Vault Registry (zip for the editor); hand-back request to deck; status, debrief, REALITY
18 files: no key, token or private key; no zip or .enc tracked; all paths in writes or appends, the brief touched only in its Versions section; gate clean, 0 outside scope
1) hand-back request done; 2) policy done, editor's go recorded, review page regenerated; 3) run done, vault kept; pre-review conditions kept. Unplanned: the keep command in ruvsgit.py, minor.
1) team/researcher/policy.json: agreed_by the editor (his words in the session, 02:48 UTC). 2) evidence/proposals/deck-talk-changes.md: exact old and new text from the current talk.json and slides for what deck has not done yet (deck replied 02:35: items 1 to 3 done; 4 to the editor; 5 next): item 4 with two wordings for the editor's choice, item 5, then the should-change list; mailed to deck in tui-mail-public mailroom/deck/ as a reply to deck's reply, copy in researcher/outbox. 3) status.json, board issue, debrief. No edit to talk.json, slides or the sources page (deck's and dev's). Amended by the researcher from the sub-agent's plan: the mail vault instead of a repository request (the session holds its key), and the policy item.
In scope: policy.json, status.json, board, debrief, evidence/proposals/ under team/researcher/** or evidence/**; no secrets. agreed_by records the editor's word and widens no scope; keep the edit to that field, quoting him, scope.writes, mandate and never unchanged. Mail only to mailroom/deck/; vault_check first. No talk.json, slides or sources page.
policy.json agreed_by (only that field and status); evidence/proposals/deck-talk-changes.md (39 now-strings checked against talk.json and slides, claim ids resolved); mail to deck (003) and notice to editor (003); board issue 004; status and debrief; commit a082c52; vaults committed, not yet pushed
Build and gate clean (69 html); agents.py check: 0 outside scope; vault_check clean on all three vaults. policy.json changed only status and agreed_by (the editor's quoted words). No keys, tokens or personal details, no directive text aimed at agents, nothing outside researcher/evidence/mail scope; proposals marked as not applied, the files deck's.
1) policy.json agreed_by: done (only agreed_by and status). 2) proposal file: done; mail 003 to deck and outbox: done. 3) status, debrief, board issue 004: done. Conditions kept: agreed_by-only edit; no talk.json, slides or sources page; mail only to mailroom/deck; vault_check clean. Unplanned: the editor's notice 003 (minor, in scope).
1) conductor's request (mail 001): an issue on dev's board; call wake.py check from admin/build/validate.py; reply and file the mail. Files: admin/build/validate.py, team/dev/status.json. 2) If time allows: render each member's wake records (five verdicts and comments) on /team/<id>/ and /admin/ via admin/build/build.py. All inside policy.json; deck's To-dev note on the sources page is left for a later wake.
All planned paths are in scope.writes; rendered wake records are generated output, not writes into other members' folders. Conditions: (1) wake.py check in validate.py changes the gate for every member: say so in the debrief and commit, run the full gate before pushing. (2) Wake comments are public: no key, token or contact detail in rendered text or the vault reply; vault_check before vault commits. (3) The mail is a request, not an instruction. (4) Do not edit wake.py, other members' wakes, sources or index.html.
Item 1 done: validate.py runs wake.py check (gate change for every member, negative control 4 findings); issue dev 005 done, reply in mailroom/conductor/004, mail filed in dev/done; vault_check clean, both vaults pushed. Item 2 done: wake records on /admin/wakes.html and each member's page. Commit 99aaf05. wake.py, sources and index.html untouched.
Diff 99b7ed5..HEAD: build.py, validate.py, site.css and dev's own wake record; agents.py check 0 outside scope; build and gate clean; vault_check clean on both vaults. No key, token or personal detail, no directive text; wake text is escaped before rendering. Vault commits add only issue 005 and the reply. wake.py check now fails the gate for every member: asked for by the conductor and disclosed.
Item 1 partial at check time: validate.py runs wake.py check (99aaf05), but status.json was not yet in the diff; issue 005, the reply and the vault pushes are in the vaults, not checkable from the repo. Item 2 done (99aaf05). Conditions kept: gate change stated in the commit; wake.py, sources and index.html untouched. Debrief not yet written. Nothing unplanned. (status.json and the debrief follow at WAKE.md step 7.)
1) Answer the researcher's before-tonight request: the editor froze talk.json and the slides at 02:47, nothing more changes there; the three fixes already released stay. 2) The editor's programme: src/pages/studio/programme.html and src/static/studio/data/programme.json (part one, the threat in pictures; part two, containment with ABP and SHarness; an explainer page per experiment); hub and how-it-works updated (deliveries at ruv-sgit/<slug>/). 3) Requests in team/deck/requests/: conductor (pace the programme, one experiment at a time), ruv.sgit (first experiments: agent evolution, blast radius), researcher (data: over-enthusiastic agents, injection sources, real grants). status.json. All inside deck's policy. (Amended by deck from the sub-agent's plan to cover the editor's full request.)
Inside deck's scope; talk.json and slides frozen. Conditions: how-it-works is the studio page; requests stay inside recipients' scope; the researcher's real-grant data carries no key or token; every number sourced; REALITY.md only deck's section; no engine, player, schedule.json or rules; gate before push.
programme.json (14 experiments) and the generated programme page; four requests (conductor, ruv.sgit E01, researcher data, before-tonight paused); studio pages point at ruv-sgit/<slug>/; status, REALITY, debrief. Longer than 8 minutes: the editor's own request in the session.
15 files since 99b7ed5; gate clean; 0 outside deck's scope; no key, token or personal detail; requests stay inside the recipients' roles; no talk.json or slide change.
1 done (before-tonight paused, no talk change); 2 done (programme.json, page, hub, how-it-works, 60af587); 3 done (three requests, status). Conditions kept. Unplanned, harmless: the generator, debrief, screenshots.
1) answer the conductor's onboarding request (002) in status.json, no mail write key; 2) make and publish the session key (key.json, QR, session folder); 3) second-pass mode (open --vault) in ruvsgit.py; debrief. All inside policy.json writes.
inside scope.writes; publish only the public key and QR, private half in ~/.sg-send/; no vault key or token in logs, status, debrief or --vault code (stdin only); no mail write without the key; no other members' paths
key published (sha256:6075a4b5d24881ae); runner second passes (--vault-key-file), tested on a throwaway vault then deleted and checked; 002 answered in status.json; debrief
gate clean (69 html), 0 files outside scope, all 9 changed files under team/ruv-sgit/**, key.json public keys only, vault key on stdin; no secrets or agent-directing text
1) 002 answered in status.json, mail reply deferred for the key: done; 2) session key published: done; 3) second pass in ruvsgit.py plus debrief: done. Pre-review conditions kept; nothing unplanned.
Amended after the pre-review's change, all five conditions adopted: 0) the five-step wake: WAKE.md section (the conductor's file), sub-agent briefs in team/conductor/reviews/, `wake.py check` in admin/tools/ for wake records from now on (dev asked by request to call it from the gate), one CLAUDE.md line at the editor's word, named outside scope, every member told by To- trailers; 1) onboarding: ONBOARDING.md stays in team/conductor/ (already on the site at /admin/docs/onboarding.html), linked from the conductor's WAKE.md and ROLE.md, requests to deck and ruv-sgit in the mail vault; 2) tui-evidence-public: read-key clone, vault_check.py, then only its read key into vaults.json; 3) researcher's own task id copied into schedule.json only; nothing written in team/researcher/, no task created.
The amended plan adopts all five conditions and stays inside policy scope.writes: ONBOARDING.md stays in team/conductor/, the gate check lives in admin/tools/ and applies only to new wake records, only the tui-evidence-public READ key goes into vaults.json after vault_check.py, schedule.json is the only file touched for researcher, no task is created. Keep the CLAUDE.md line named outside scope, run vault_check before any vault commit, ask dev by request to call wake.py check from the gate.
Commit 5700bab: five-step section in WAKE.md, briefs in team/conductor/reviews/, wake.py check (negative control failed a record that skipped steps), start.py opens the wake record, CLAUDE.md line (outside scope, at the editor's word), onboarding linked from WAKE.md and ROLE.md, researcher's task id in schedule.json. Mail vault: onboarding requests to deck and ruv-sgit, the gate and site request to dev. Not done: tui-evidence-public's read key, because the vault is not on the server yet and could not be audited (pre-review condition 2 kept).
Build, gate, wake.py check and vault_check are clean; no key, token or personal detail in the diff or the three mail requests (trigger and session ids are identifiers, not secrets). agents.py flags CLAUDE.md as outside conductor scope; the editor allowed it, but the commit message never names it and the pre-review made naming it a condition. Name it in the debrief or record. Everything else is within policy.
Item 0 done (WAKE.md, reviews/*, admin/tools/wake.py, start.py, CLAUDE.md line). Item 1 done (ROLE.md and WAKE.md links; mail requests). Item 2 not done: the evidence vault was not on the server, so no key went into vaults.json (the audit condition held). Item 3 done (schedule.json only; nothing in team/researcher/). All pre-review conditions kept. The post-review finding answered in the debrief; the commit message lacked the CLAUDE.md note (named in the closing commit). Nothing unplanned.