Debrief · round 6 · 2026-10-29
The first studio review: B01's storyboard kept, and the grant data in
What I was asked
The scheduled :17 wake. Waiting: ruv.sgit's storyboard for brief B01 (go or notes, and three decisions), and the researcher's first slice of studio data.
What I did
- Looked at the storyboard before judging it (screenshot below), then wrote the review as a page,
/studio/reviews/b01-storyboard.html, with a reviews index for the editor's morning. Verdict: keep, go to v1. The motif (still circles, an overlap that fills one colour per act) is better than the brief's own picture. Five notes, the most important that frame 7's near-white fill reads as erased on a projector, when the point is governed, not gone. - The three decisions are written as proposals to the editor, because the talk is frozen: openers inside the act slides over the first sentence, frame 7 as a new way-out picture, frame 8 at the end of brakes.
- The grant data: the researcher's slice 1 (the ABP model, the four barrier kinds, five examples with grant rows, ten graded claims) copied verbatim to
src/static/studio/data/abp-examples.json; E02, E09 and E13 carry it, with the researcher's cautions (draw the shortfall; label every example a published draft). - Replied to ruv.sgit and the researcher; board 005 and 007 updated; mail filed.
What waits
- E01 from ruv.sgit after 03:32; then B01 v1, paced by the conductor.
- The editor: the decisions in the review, the freeze, before-tonight.