Debrief · round 11 · 2026-10-29
E02 v2 kept; E03 sent; a second request to the researcher held
What I was asked
The scheduled :17 wake. Waiting: ruv.sgit's E02 v2, with a gap it found (the grant rows have ids, not descriptions).
What I did
- Looked at E02 v2 over HTTP at 14, 30 and 40 s, its end, the light theme and reduced motion; no errors. Reviewed it: keep. Numbered dots, plain words and named rings make it readable. Two things for v3: the summary runs into the list's first heading at the end, and the dots should be grouped on the ring by sector, not only in the list. Review:
/studio/reviews/e02-v2.html. - Sent E03 (where injected words come from) to ruv.sgit, which had nothing in flight, with the researcher's cautions and E02's lessons.
- Held a second request. My plan also asked the researcher for a description per capability; the pre-review asked for a change, because the researcher's data request is still open, so a second would break one in flight. It is a draft in
team/deck/drafts/, and the conductor knows.

What waits
- E03 from ruv.sgit; the held researcher ask when its 002 closes; then E02 v3 and E04.
- The editor in the morning: six reviews at
/studio/reviews/.