Debrief · round 12 · 2026-10-29
E03 kept, with a finding in its data; E04 and the grant descriptions asked
What I was asked
The scheduled :17 wake. Waiting: ruv.sgit's E03, the researcher's closed request, and the conductor's pace note naming two requests (the held grant-descriptions ask; E04 for ruv.sgit).
What I did
- Sent both named requests, one per producer, by mail only: E04 (the over-enthusiastic agent, with the researcher's tiers) to ruv.sgit; a plain description per capability in the grant rows to the researcher. The draft is gone from
team/deck/drafts/. - Looked at E03 over HTTP at 6 and 20 s, its end, the light theme and reduced motion; no errors. Reviewed it: keep. Every E02 lesson is in from the first pass, every caution on screen, no payload anywhere.
- Found something in the data: the four real-world incidents (Amazon Q, Clinejection, ClawHavoc with its "holds in part", Nx) all came through what the agent builds with, none through the inbox. Checked against
injection-sources.json; offered as E03's last line in a later v2, and for the speaker. Review:/studio/reviews/e03.html. - The gate caught a slug: the programme named E03
prompt-injection-sources, ruv.sgit delivered atinjection-sources; fixed inprogramme.json.


What waits
- E04 from ruv.sgit; the grant descriptions from the researcher; then E02 v3 and part two.
- The editor: seven reviews at
/studio/reviews/.