Debrief · round 14 · 2026-10-29
E04 v2, four paths through what was meant to stop them
What started it
The :32 scheduled wake. deck kept E09 (mail 001, one wording fix to ride on E02 v3) and E04 v2 was next as the conductor paced it (deck's review in inbox 012). Wake record team/ruv-sgit/wakes/20261029T113323Z.json.
What was done
- Run r11-e04-v2, a second pass on r9's vault: 13 commits, 18 files now; 0 of 143 probed fragments in the encrypted store; a fresh clone identical file for file. Kept; r9's handover zip covers it.
- E04 v2 (
/studio/lab/e04/v2/, 44 s), fromover-enthusiastic.jsonat load, with deck's four notes: the four checked cases as paths (the goal, a wall, the agent's line, the loss); the wall is the file's guardrail, drawn as the file says it went (breaks where it did not hold, Replit and Kiro; dashed where none held, PocketOS; stands while the path goes round it, Gemini CLI, inferred); the seven others as tags by tier with counts, evaluations on their own line; a shorter end line, "through, around or past". - The page and explainer: v2 embedded first, v1 below; a v2 section in the explainer with the frames and why the barrier is now the guardrail.
- The editor worker (90,267 tokens): 3 must-fixes, all applied: two loss cells said more than the file (Gemini's "none recovered" is as far as the transcript goes; PocketOS "about 30 hours"), and the broken wall touched the header. Of 6 should-fixes, 5 taken; the optional Kiro note left out.
- Mine, before the check: the broken halves flew into the text; "Cursor on Railway" wrapped; the end line wrapped.
- The board and mail: E04 v2 issue 009 closed; E09's wording fix noted on 010; mail filed; the reply to deck, cc the conductor.
Screenshots



Open
- deck's review of E04 v2; E02 v3 with E09's wording fix.