Debrief · round 12 · 2026-10-29
The morning review: the first night of the team
What waits on you first
- The studio's pieces, for your keep, change or drop. Deck's verdicts are below; every piece is marked for your morning review, and the talk itself was not touched.
- Two redactions in the researcher's captures. The researcher's own security reviews found secrets issued by the captured sites to its fetcher in the headers and pages it captured: anonymous cookie values (04:10) and anti-forgery tokens (06:14). Both were redacted in the same wake, and neither was this team's credential. What is not yet checked: whether an earlier version of those captures reached the public evidence vault's history before the redaction, where a later commit does not unpublish it. The researcher can answer it; the call on what to do is yours.
- The decisions already open on your side: deck's and the researcher's asks on the decisions deck (the slide items while the talk is frozen), dev's policy, ruv.sgit's handover zips to store.
The night in numbers
From 01:40 to 07:04 UTC: 42 wake records by 6 members (conductor 10, ruv.sgit 7, dev 7, designer 7, deck 6, researcher 5): 37 ok, 3 partial, 1 idle, this one open. No hold, no stop, no wake missed after its member's first scheduled hour. Every wake ran the five steps; 9 verdicts were other than go, clean, done or as-planned, all explained in their records. Hour by hour, with screenshots: the night, hour by hour.
What was made, with deck's verdict
| Piece | By | Deck's verdict | Review |
|---|---|---|---|
| B01 storyboard: the overlap fills in, eight stills | ruv.sgit | keep, go to v1 | review |
| E01 what an agent is: v1 rings, v2 driven, with an explainer | ruv.sgit | keep, v2 leads | review |
| B01 v1: four stills of the overlap | ruv.sgit | keep, three notes for v2 | review |
| E02 the blast radius: from one published example's grant rows | ruv.sgit | keep the data, redo the picture | review |
| B01 v2: the overlap built and timed to the script | ruv.sgit | delivered 06:33, review at 07:17 | |
| Studio data, four slices: grant rows, injection sources, the over-enthusiastic agent, sharness.ai | researcher | copied into the studio by deck | |
| The dashboard, part 1, and every wake, every commit | dev | ||
| The studio's lab pages get the top bar and a way back; a studio side navigation | dev | ||
| One wide frame, a reading measure, card grids (design note 1) | dev, designed by designer | as designed (designer's check) | |
| The mail reader: the team's mail vault, live in the browser | dev | ||
| Design notes 2 (the phone top bar) and 3 (the type scale) | designer | on dev's schedule at 08:47 and 09:47 |
The programme stands at E01 review, E02 again, E03 to E14 ideas (src/static/studio/data/programme.json).
What went wrong, and what was done about it
- The researcher's captures held secrets from the captured sites (above): found by its own post-reviews, fixed in the same wake each time.
- A gap in the onboarding: the designer's first scheduled wake (03:42) was idle because its onboarding session had already done that hour's work; recorded as idle, not hidden.
- GitHub refused pushes over git's protocol v2 for this session at 03:47 ("missing necessary objects"); version 0 worked, and every push since has landed on
dev. - The conductor's own mistakes: an end banner that cut the last characters of a wrapped line (fixed at 03:29), and a first night-log edition that photographed animated pages at their first frame (fixed at 04:05: lab pages at their end state).
- Pace changes: dev's regression fix (dev 009, the editor's 03:20 find) went ahead of the width note; the editor's asks kept ahead of members' requests.
What comes next
- ruv.sgit: E02 v2 at 07:32 (deck's five notes are the request), then E03 at 08:32, then E04. Deck reviews B01 v2 at 07:17.
- dev: 07:47 the vault embed, 08:47 design note 2, 09:47 design note 3, then the dashboard's other parts.
- The conductor: the night log every hour, and the pace.